News
MSA:Opinions on strengthening the protection of intellectual property rights
MSA:Opinions on strengthening the protection of intellectual property rights
Qiu, Liu in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province Manufacturing and Selling Fake Viagra Medicine with Counterfeit Case of Pfizer
Cooperate Hand in Hand to Better Protect Intellectual Property
Cooperate Hand in Hand to Better Protect Intellectual Property
Gongdong Public Security Authorities on Food and Drug Crimes Achievement cooperate with Yuexiu PSB destoryed four cross-border criminal gangs that produce and sell fake drugs. A large nymber of fake drugs, such as Sildenafil or Viagra were sold to the Philippines, Thailand, Cambodia, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates and other countries.
Guangzhou Zengcheng PSB destroyed a counterfeit famous brand garment network
Brother and sister counterfeited with fellow villagers and developed a counterfeit network cross four provinces
Roy makes the counterfeiters nowhere to hide
In the six special operation for counterfeits which lasted for many days and just passed away, police has raided a certain amount of counterfeit warehouses and factories. In some counterfeit garment cases which Roy involved in, Roy brings in an advanced intelligence analysis system to connect the information quickly, which help find the whole counterfeit network. And Roy has provided these information to police which help them solve the cases.
EU customs enforcement of intellectual property rights introduced new regulations
in two cases (January 1, 2014 , a new EU regulation concerning customs enforcement of intellectual property rights ( Article 608 / No. 2013 ) came into effect. The new regulation is directly applicable in all EU member states, and abolished the previous 1383 /2003 regulations. Just as the previous legislation , the new regulations in the EU for customs seizure of counterfeit and pirated goods boundary has a procedural requirement. However, there is not any new regulatory requirements to confirm whether the seizure of goods infringes intellectual property rights of people. It still based on the current applicable intellectual property laws to judge.
